Another question for our L8s?

As of now, I have been calling them 6-POG Panels.

Yesterday I found the Master Collector of POGs, and they use "Card", 6-POG Unpunched Card.

Since this is mostly unchartered territory, What do you think would be best? 

CARD it is. From now on they are "Unpunched CARDS". Panel should be removed and replaced with CARD for POG sets.

After PMing Dan, the format should look like this [just an example] :

1995 [anywhere from 1990-1998] Walt Disney Movie POGS

# of cards [POGS] depends on How Many comprise a set; 6, 12, 18, 24 etc. mostly in multiples of 6

Size 1 5/8"

Release Notes: Will Identify the specific set with it's own Identifier ex. @ The Walt Disney Company

and so on. [This was Dan's 1st suggestion on pg 4]

**The CARD itself can be listed in Insert & Related Sets

Any other adds or deletes? Think this will do it?

~bob~

No. This is not the format I suggested.

Note 1 is incorrect. I never said that.

The parenthtical character name is to be in the Name field in the parentheses. That was never meant to indicate that would be in Note.

Picky Picky...........How's this?

Not picky, but quote me correctly. Don't say I said things that I didn't say. 

C'mon Man....

Give an old geezer a break. lol

BUT DOES THAT LOOK OK?

In the hope to finally make this thread go away so that others that have issues unresolved don't get buried every morning, this is a direct quote of what Dan said on how to do it:

If the set is for "Disney Movies", then the Names should all be those movie titles with the name of the character featured on the POG in parentheses.

Examples:

NNO - The Little Mermaid (Ariel)
NNO - The Little Mermaid (Sebastien)

Only if there is more than one POG / card of the same character from the same movie in the same set would there be a need for Note 2 where a description of the character  would then be written in short, brief words. Not sure how this can be made clearer.

Bruno, Why so nasty?

I do it wrong, I'm roasted.......

I try to do it right, I'm roasted....

I think your last post said exactly what I said in reference to Dan's formatting.

Man you guys are testy, lighten up, I was always told to use the forum to address issues, so I did just that! This post can extend for another 10 pages, it shouldn't be anybody's problem, It's a forum, it's a TCBd's forum with strict listing guidelines.

Should I do it right? ........ OR.........Do it wrong? ....OR ....Do it my way.? And extend the post even longer?

What's your druthers, Bro?

Bob, something must be missing in this post as there is no example of how you are proposing on doing it.  The way Dan suggested and that I copied and pasted is the way to go about it.

The problem with bringing this up over an dover again is that there are other posts that ask for resolution to possible issues but they get buried with these that go on and on even though it was resolved on page 4.  If you had followed Dan's example, posted a sample of the first 3 or 4 cards of the set as to how you were going to do it, then you would have either had a thumb's up or down with what needed changing.  But never was Dan's example used.

What I see in the set you are working on (and only talk about one set at a time as multiple sets with different themes only confuses the issue) is this is what you want (and I am only guessing at movies or characters):

Card #     Name                               Note 1        Note 2

NNO        Little Mermaid (Ariel)

NNO        Aladdin (Aladdin)

NNO        Aladdin                                              Magic carpet flight

etc.

From everything I have seen, I doubt if Note 1 will need to have any entries as there are no RC, AU, SN, FOIL, etc. in the set of pogs you have from the examples you have posted.  If you think there may be reason to enter something there for one particular POG, once the checklist is up with images, ti would be easier for a decision to be made if not obvious.

Trust me, I don't know everything about entering checklists with naming conventions and Notes.  But I think Dan's example was fairly clear to at least make an attempt on it.  I hope this helps in getting the first of these POG checklists done.