1995 Walt Disney Productions Disney Movies Pogs Non-Sport Forum

Bob, you're saying two different things. You're saying that Ryan went with "character names" when the set is about Movies, yet your original checklist is not simply movie titles. So, where would we get the impression that the set should have been based on movie titles?

You have not been very clear in your descriptions or intent in this thread, and that has been what has dragged it out.

I didn't think I had to be specific, only needed a general rule to add the checklist. What's the difference if it's a Movies set or Movie character set.? 

I really want to get this done, so I can move on with other things.

Is Ryan's format OK or does it have to get changed. If OK, I'm entering it at 5am Tuesday, followed by the scans. 

I Fleer Sticker work to do.

Thx everybody, ~bob~

Oh, that CAD comment really got me!

Yeah... Go for it CAD !

Rethinking this, maybe I should use my original CL now, based on Movies?

The difference between movie title names and character names is how they're linked to characters to make them easier to find when searching for them. There's an extra step involved if you do movie titles.

Lion King Pog Checklist

Looking at that linked checklist, if those were unnumbered and had no text on the pogs, I would have no idea which one to choose. What is "Scar 1" vs "Scar 2"? What is "Lion King & Nala" vs "Nala & Lion King"? That's why we're asking you to add the checklist the way someone new to the site would look for them. Best bet is character name in Name field, description in Note2 field.

Allow me to reiterate a few points.

If the set is for "Disney Movies", then the Names should all be those movie titles with the name of the character featured on the POG in parentheses.

Examples:

NNO - The Little Mermaid (Ariel)
NNO - The Little Mermaid (Sebastien)

Or, if your set is simply character-based:

NNO - Ariel
NNO - Sebastien

If, there are multiple POGs of the same movie and same character, then the Note2 field will come into play:

NNO - The Little Mermaid (Ariel) - Looking in mirror
NNO - The Little Mermaid (Ariel) - Singing
NNO - The Little Mermaid (Sebastien)

There is NEVER a need to say that the POG comes from the top position on panel #3. If the POG panels are numbered (or not), then they would be in a releated set, and listed in the pairs that they were issued in (if that was the sole distribution method).

Got it now?

Yup, 3rd try, got it. CL#1 "Movies" [24 POGS] and CL#2 Movie panels [2 panels]. I'll use the last format from Dan.

Need to get it right, I do have a few more similar to add .

So, I have both CLs prepared to submit following Dan's format for Movies.

It seems a bit redundat to do Cinderella (Cinerella) , Spinning as the  Movie (character), Note2 format.

So be it, and that's what I did. 

Bob - 

I see by its appearance in the "New Galleries" section that you only put two of the four panels in the Unpunched Panels checklist.  Given that they are all NNO, and you only used "Panel 1" and "Panel 2" as the names, it would have been perfectly appropriate to include "Panel 3" & "Panel 4" on the list since they must exist.  The way you have the first two described, knowing which POGs are on each panel is not vital to the listing of the other two.

==========================================

For anyone who is creating a checklist for a set when they don't have all of the set in their possession, I give the following example:

As for the other two Unpunched Panels, I did a search on Worthpoint.com for 'Disney POGS unpunched'.  It returned 11 hits.  It took me about three minutes to survey the pictures and spot the two 'missing' panels from this set.

In the bottom row, second from the left in this picture is a panel with the Bambi, Aristocats, Dumbo, Cinderella, Lion King, and Little Mermaid pogs.

The lower panel in this photo includes the three Peter Pan POGs, as well as the other Bambi, Lion King and Cinderella examples.

While photos like these are not acceptable for upload to the database, they are perfeclty valid information which one can base a listing on.

-Tom

*The preceeding message is intended for educational and informational purposes only.  Please do not misconstrue any criticizm from this post, as that connotation is absolutely not intended.*

To add to Tom's post - Bob, why did you add an incomplete checklist? I know I said repeatedly to only upload COMPLETE checklists. Now you've created work for someone else.