Random Card of the Day |
Sunday, March 7, 2021Set: 2013 Grandstand Springfield Cardinals SGA (Rate) “ Learning to play baseball the right way, in the Cardinal farm system ” -abide 4 “ The branding everywhere is kind of lame but it's a nice design for a minor league card either way ” -pugchump 3 “ Cool team logo on the team name bar. The player's position abbreviation inside the baseball icon is smart. Finished off with an excellent choice of the player in game photo, makes this card front pop. The back has a clean look, and the card number inside the baseball diamond is a nice touch. To me, this is an example of a perfect baseball card. ” -CollectingAfterDeath 6 “ Nice sysco block logo must be before the invention of the transparent png file. Really nice back for a minor league card. ” -parsley24 “ Nice Minor League card. ” -captkirk42 “ Great looking minor league card!! ” -mkaz80 “ Love the back. ” -NJDevils “ Looks like the major card companies could use this as a lesson, sometimes lessen is more. Which Springfield? ” -baseballcardstoreca “ Why are the last two letters of Adam’s name lowercase? ” -mkb |
Saturday, March 6, 2021Set: 2019 Panini Luminance (Rate) “ This is a really nice design. I really like it. ” -muskie027 1 “ I don't think Panini understands what the word Luminance means. My autocorrect tried to change Panini to "pain"...well played autocorrect. ” -Billy Kingsley 9 “ It really bothers me that they used the same photo on both sides but they retouched the color on the back only ” -pugchump 3 “ Might as well put his name in comic sans. It would still look better. ” -DarkSide830 “ I like the design of this card. ” -Brendan Barrick 1 “ Wow this card is from 2019? and not the 1990s? ” -captkirk42 |
Thursday, March 4, 2021Set: 2018-19 Panini Select - White Prizms (Rate) “ As a continued brand, this set should be listed as Select. ” -Billy Kingsley 2 “ An OK design. I don't "like" it much but it looks good. Don't know what those side panels are supposed to be other than some fancy border for the card (and possibly the part of the card that would be removed for a die-cut version). Back is rather plain. OH I looked at the card "title" again White PRIZMS those are supposed to be prizms, explains why it is a serial numbered version. ” -captkirk42 “ Talk about a mind wrap of a design. Though this design would be a cool base for a dual relic on the sides. ” -OverkillKid “ Nothing to write home about. ” -Phil |
Wednesday, March 3, 2021Set: 2005-06 Upper Deck Artifacts (Rate) “ Yes. Nice card. Rookie way back then and still playing in finnish league this season representing Oulun Kärpät. This is propably his last season though, because he has slowed down quite a lot and his shot is not so threathening for the goalies. But he managed to produce nice penalty shot few days ago. ” -Duke 3 “ I was just getting back into the hobby around this time. I wasn't aware of Artifacts but if I had been I would've bought it. Jussi was one of my Mom's faves when he played for the Flightless Birdies. ” -Gunny “ Sharp card! It's weird flipping it around and not seeing panini anywhere, lol. Oh the good ole days. Great stuff upper deck! ” -Madden95 1 “ This is a good opportunity to talk about serial numbers, since I don't know anything about hockey or hockey cards. Serial numbered cards have a special place in my heart, it gives me a feeling that I pulled something special, not some manufactured base garbage. The first one I got was a 2019 Topps Advanced Stat Miguel Sano, and I didn't even notice until I logged it to my collection a year later. By then I had already gotten A Big League Baseball Rainbow Refractor /100 and a 2019 Topps Heritage Stamp Relic /50. I don't purchase high end, so these serial number cards are pretty cool when I pull them. ” -NickyCollects 1 “ A great looking hockey card until you flip it over and its the same photo. dang. ” -parsley24 “ Nice looking design, but not for cards. ” -captkirk42 “ This is an ok design. ” -Brendan Barrick “ Very early #'d card. If only upper deck was allowed more than hockey. ” -OverkillKid 1 “ The first year of Artifacts - very nice cards ” -suomibear8 “ Pretty plain, only 3 colors and they used the same photo on both sides ” -pugchump |
Monday, March 1, 2021Set: 2017 Bowman Platinum - Purple (Rate) “ that's a pretty RC card of the 2019 ML MVP ” -abide 2 “ Bowman Platinum always just looks ugly to me. I don't understand the appeal. It's a low-rent set that is trying way too heard to be upper tier. Hard pass. ” -ketchupman36 2 “ Card doesn’t look too bad. Nice rookie card of a star. ” -mkb 1 “ A pretty nice card here! Sure it's not exactly cheap, either. ” -IfbBirdsCards “ Oh dang it is a parallel, I was beginning to think that maybe Bowman Platinum was getting away from the boring silver foil/chrome looks. ” -captkirk42 “ I have been a fan of the various Platinum sets released through the years and I dig this one too. ” -Corky 1 “ Ooh, Bellinger Rookie Card. I like the card art and value is probably great. ” -NickyCollects “ Love me some Bowman Platinum! Clean and classy in my humble opinion. ” -Madden95 |
Sunday, February 28, 2021Set: 2008 Topps Chrome - Xfractors (Rate) “ Scan make it rough, but I'll bet it is pretty cool in hand. ” -muskie027 1 “ I like the design of this card. ” -Brendan Barrick “ Probably “Not Quite” but a Bucs card opening for comments a few weeks after their Super Bowl win 🤔🤣😉 ” -stevejrogers “ Like the 2008 Topps Design. Won't comment about not liking Chrome. Black background I forget is that just for the X-Fractors? ” -captkirk42 “ BUCKEYE!! Joey was a helluva player for years. Just shy of HOF worthy, but in my opinion, not by a whole lot. And since his playing days he's joined a huge list of former OSU players to move to the broadcast studio, and in my opinion has done well for himself there as well. Joey is my third highest total in my Buckeye PC, behind only Cris Carter and Eddie George. ” -Brimose “ Can't stand 2008 Topps. ” -DarkSide830 |
Saturday, February 27, 2021Set: 2012 Bowman Chrome - Prospects (Rate) “ Maybe it's just me but I don't think the team logo should be smaller than the Bowman Chrome logo ” -pugchump 3 “ Either Daniel was planning to bunt and said "NO" or the photographer caught him just as he was starting to show a bunt. Either way, I like the photo and the design. Bowman tends to have nice designs overall, but Topps destroys that with multiple versions of EVERYTHING! I'd bet that there are 4-6 versions of this card before you even get into the parallels of this card. I still like the general design of this specific card though. ” -spazmatastic 4 “ This design is almost too basic. I dont like all the wasted space on the border. ” -parsley24 “ Solid! As a collector from the 1900's I've always had a thing for these shiny cards. ” -Madden95 “ I think I've mentioned my love/hate with Bowman sets many times. I like the designs for the most part. I recall in 2012 I got plenty of these cards and probably have a Nationals team set maybe, maybe not. I really hate the Prospect aspect of the set particularly the numbering system that Topps uses for Bowan flagship and Chrome. First they use BC# for the very base chrome cards which are the regular guys and vets, then they use P =Prospect well really BCP# Bowman Chrome Prospect, then there is I think BCPD which is Prospect-Draft or is it BCDP? see I'm confused already. Then when I look on the checklists to see if my card for some guy who was only drafted by the team with a minor league contract and never made it to the Big team is in the set that is called "Bowman Chrome Drafts and Prospects" or just "Bowman Prospects". I never know which "set" to look under. ” -captkirk42 “ yeet ” -Buckeye Fan “ That's a good scan for a chrome card. I used to love them before I began scanning my entire collection. Not so much anymore. ” -Billy Kingsley “ I never got into Chrome, but liked the few i pulled as inserts. They have a fun cool look to them. ” -muskie027 |
Friday, February 26, 2021Set: 2007 Ganz Webkinz Series 2 (Rate) Card: #B2-02 Dex Dangerous, To The Rescue! “ the statistics on the back are disappointing ” -abide 9 “ ? ” -muskie027 1 “ FRICKING WEBKINZ LOL Doesn’t look like that bad of a design tho ” -mkb 2 “ "Screen legend". weird ” -cjjt “ 0 people have this card on their wantlist. Shocker. ” -parsley24 3 “ Probably one of the few non-sports sets I haven't heard of, but it must have been popular, seeing as this is Series 2! ” -bkklaos “ A lion flying around, looking to taser a teddy bear, who is suffering with a bad case of pink eye. GRRRREAT! ” -CollectingAfterDeath 4 “ Nice kids non sport card. A TCG? CCG? ” -captkirk42 “ Hate these non-sports cards . . . but those who like them, enjoy . . . ” -georgecf 1 “ Webkinz seem to be a bit more deadly than I remember. ” -rmpaq5 3 “ Webkinz! My kids used to be into those. ” -trauty |
