Bruno, I misunderstood your intention. I thought you were attempting to get the links added to the cards with the stories of different players on the back (which seems like a reasonable thing, no?) and/or getting the questionable links on a card where faces and/or numbers can barely be seen, let alone discerned, removed. Both of which seemed like valid points. I was simply stating what current TCDB policy is.
I have not added them to my "HOFer base set wants" because I didn't see them when I was creating my want lists. Had they been linked, they would certainly go on it, and be welcomed into the Bob Gibson collection (as would any others featured if they fit my collections). I welcome the discussion, and I hope it brings to light something that needs to be changed here.
Now, I don't think a card that merely mentions a different player on the back shpuld be linked. These 1972 cards do not seem to be "normal" cards. They almost feel like a double-sided card. Please, discuss.
edited to fix typos
sandyrusty wrote:
Not asking that they be linked but asking collectors if they would include them in their PC. I include them in my Gibson collection but I definitely don't include the TC in it.
It is a question of collecting preferences, not requesting a change in how the database does things. I thought such discussions were allowed and even encouraged, not discouraged. I will go back in my own world of collecting now and refrain from engaging in discussions.
-- Dan --
Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).