I have both the standard catalog and beckett almanac. Although I like the organization of the standard catalog better, the pricing is just unrealistic and outrageous. Unless you're looking for an inflated sense of value for your personal collection, or are looking to spend too much on your collection, I'd ignore the prices in the standard catalog. It makes the mid-to-high grade cards look like they're worth more than they are, and makes the low grade cards look like they are worthless. The book just doesn't have a good grasp on the actual buy/sell market. Easier to use just doesn't translate into accuracy here. Although I have my gripes about Beckett, it's really the best option for pricing--at least for baseball cards.
Beckett-- 2 columns representing a high-low range for a single card grade (I just use Hi column). Actual value is adjusted according to card grade using a percentage chart. For modern cards, the price listed represents [NM-MT 8.0] condition cards. For older cards, the price could represent lower grades from [NM 7.0] for '50s-'70s cards, down to [VG-EX 4.0] for tobacco cards. It tells you what grade the price represents.
Standard Catalog-- It has no hi/lo range. It attempts to pin-point the precise value for 3 different card grades. Below the lowest grade provided, it says to half the price for each lower grade (so 50% of 50% of 50%, etc.). Often, the column grades provided don't represent common grades that you'd expect to find the cards in--like tobacco cards in [MT 9.0] condition. Pricing in this book is seriously jacked. Dean's cards probably uses this book.
I keep both books on hand, but use Beckett for numbers, and Standard Catalog for another perspective on words.
randylaw wrote:
I've always preferred the Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards over the Beckett. In my opinion it is easier to use and I find the content is better also