| Posted By | Message |
|
bronnerea
Posts: 131
Joined: Jan 2012
|
| Wednesday, July 15, 2020 7:50 PM | |
Posting here for thoughts on how to handle this card. Cramer produced six different minor league sets in 1978. All are listed in the DB as separate sets, and until I got this checklist in a set of 1978 Albuquerque Dukes, I didn't know there was a checklist linking all of the sets together.
|
|
|
|
|
Derek McDonough
Posts: 480
Joined: Jan 2020
|
| Wednesday, July 15, 2020 8:31 PM | |
Oh yeah, I took a look at one of the sets and there it is below the stat line with the copyright info. There is a master set number. Kind of like how TCMA used to do it. The team sets would be numbered 1-24 for example and also include a master number as if you collect all the teams to make one complete set. Cool.
-------------------------------
Minor League Collector, Collecting cards featuring players in Cedar Rapids uniforms or Logos, all sports, from past and present. Researching forgotten set variations. |
|
|
|
|
Derek McDonough
Posts: 480
Joined: Jan 2020
|
| Thursday, July 16, 2020 12:34 PM | |
-------------------------------
Minor League Collector, Collecting cards featuring players in Cedar Rapids uniforms or Logos, all sports, from past and present. Researching forgotten set variations. |
|
|
|
|
rmpaq5
Posts: 2,027
Joined: Nov 2014
|
| Thursday, July 16, 2020 12:50 PM | |
Add on that of those 6 sets, they are all numbered differently (NNO, standard, standard with letters on some cards, skip counted) so none of these actually match the cards they are supposed to represent. Since you mention you pulled it from a pack it can be assumed this was possible with each set. I would suggest a single insert in each set and those inserts are linked. I think ADMIN can do that. If not a stand alone 1 card set.
|
|
|
|
|
bronnerea
Posts: 131
Joined: Jan 2012
|
| Thursday, July 16, 2020 1:10 PM | |
The linked insert idea should work well, and even the stand-alone one-card set sounds good too. Anything I can do to help make this happen? If a one-card set, I can create and post, but I'll wait for direction before doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
rmpaq5
Posts: 2,027
Joined: Nov 2014
|
| Thursday, July 16, 2020 1:13 PM | |
Lets let the thread sit for a day and bump it back up later to see if anyone else has a better idea than these.
|
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,949
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Thursday, July 16, 2020 1:19 PM | |
I have seen other sets where Admin has linked them all together as a set with each team as a "related" set. Could do that, and then have the checklist as a single insert. Are we sure it was included in all the sets?
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
bronnerea
Posts: 131
Joined: Jan 2012
|
| Thursday, July 16, 2020 1:27 PM | |
I have opened other 1978 Cramer sets that did not include the checklist, but this was the first Albuquerque set I opened. In short, I really don't have much information about where, or to what extent, this card was distributed.
|
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,949
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Thursday, July 16, 2020 1:46 PM | |
We will need that information to be able to list it correctly.
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
bronnerea
Posts: 131
Joined: Jan 2012
|
| Thursday, July 16, 2020 9:18 PM | |
Given I know that it was included with 1978 Albuquerque, can it be listed with that set as an insert and then linked to the other 1978 Cramer sets from there?
|
|
|
|
