Card Identification Forum

No, nothing bad. Skytamer is a great resource. It's a confusing card issue, probably why it's hard to find the 48-card checklist.

Makes it difficult to determine if the card in question was originally #42 with a #36 UER or #36 ERR/COR or just a #36 VAR.  Or is Lindbergh the error/variation card?  We do know it was #42 in the 144-series.

Here's the set of 48.

http://www1.coe.neu.edu/~dan/R136/hold48.html

Edit to add:

Here's a very good discussion from the "vintage nonsport chat" forum discussing the "green" vs "black" ink variations and the two different tag lines for the 144 card set. The text in question is "This is a series of..." and "One of a series of..." This is a complicated one.

https://forum.vintagenonsports.com/post/r136-nat-chicle-skybirds-rare-uncatalogued-variations-9586719?highlight=r136

C2Cigars wrote:

The images are for the 144 series reissues. They don't show the images for the original 48 series nor backs with card numbers.

So we have images of two different 48-card Albatross cards; #36 and #42.  That would lead us to believe the card in question is an ERR with a COR.