Site Forum

The 1965 Topps #150 Brooks Robinson here https://www.tcdb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/64/cid/11633?PageIndex=2 is missing the "@T.C.G. Printed in U.S.A." line.  Is this a UER?

And to make matters worse, the identical OPC card https://www.tcdb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/8656/cid/2287408/1965-O-Pee-Chee-150-Brooks-Robinson?PageIndex=2 is missing the "@T.C.G. Printed in Canada." line. I have 3 of these and they were all purchased in large ots of 1965 OPC so I am sure a Topps card did not sneak into the pile.

So, are these UER?  If nothing else, they shold be annotated so that a collector knows he may have one or the other.

I believe this is the only card in the whole set that is missing this line.

I can’t answer your question. I just wanted to let you know that I will vote for this thread as the best thread of the year based solely on the title itself. 😂

Interesting.  I just checked out all my Red Sox cards from 1965 and they all have the copy right on the back.  I would say if we can't find the a Brooks Robinson with the copy right then definately a UER.

Trade On!

In looking at the two scan links in your thread the '65 Topps version looks too new. Possibly a reprint? Guess who submitted both of them?

I have both cards and the Topps is whiter in the white ares than the OPC so, side by side, you can tell the difference.  But neither have the copyright lines.

I just checked the first page of all the cards on Ebay and none of them have the copy right line.

How about the blue? Same thing?

Overall, the Topps is brighter than the OPC.  Believe because of the paper stock used.

LOL.  Waiting for the "maybe Topps did it on purpose" responses...

I checked all the ones on comc.  None have a copyright line.

Bump because though we have some commentary, we have not decided on a course of action.