General Forum

Only vintage and weirdly because I like to see the check marks. I remember when I used to check off the card I had been looking for all summer and what a feeling it was.

Not on Twitter but my answer is same as C2Cigars 

Yes in any era, but only if they include a photo. I despise checklists that are only a checklist.

I am also not on twitter but I love checkilist cards!

I'm also not on Checklist Cards, but I like vintage Twitter over modern Twitter

I'm going to go against the grain here and say that my main preference when it comes to checklists is ones that also have an image. For example, the more recent Topps sets have put fun images on the front, or the older sets that had the manager or team card double as a checklist. Since I got into the hobby in the age of the internet, I haven't needed the checklists for their original practical purpose, and so I tend to look at them like any other card as something that I want to be visually appealing.

No need for checklist cards in this era, but pre-beckett they were a vital source to know who you needed for your collection.  So like others, post 90s no, pre 90's yes.

I don't do Twitter...so responding here...I think Checklists are great and like them a lot.  While the comments about them not being necessary for modern cards has some value, I personally think they are a necessity for the non-major brand issues (things like team issued sets, minor league cards, etc.)  I've personally been able to enter checklists on this site due to have these checklists in hand, while other times its delayed me from entering them requiring a lot more research.  Also, contrary to many on the site, I prefer not having a picture of a player on the checklist as it just adds to the number of cards to complete a team subset just because there is someone's "head shot" on a card.

No to Twitter, yes to checklist cards of all kinds.

Count me as another without twitter, but yes, I like checklist cards as a part of a set or a stand alone/mail in set.

Scott