General Forum

Hey all, i have a question in regards to bindering a complete set....

Do you always put the cards in number order, or do you group by team if the cards from a given team are scattered throughout the set numbering? 
 

set number obviously makes the most sense, but im wondering if by team would be much more visually uniform. 

When i used to binder, it wuold be numerically. However, you'll find that there are many members here that will do it by team or other rationale. No wrong way to do it obviously.

I disagree with Jim as there is a wrong way to do it and that's doing it any way other than the way you want. 

Go to my youtube channel, and under the Playlist called "The Joy of a Completed Set"  I show many examples of sets I sorted by team. I think they look better this way. 

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCBKQRgyDdRBMU2FfP8sLKzV3VRaLsdY1

Ohhhh, sick burn there. You got me 

I did by team for a little bit, but ultimately went back to by #.  

Interesting Note: For 80s Fleer, there's no difference!

I do it by team, in the order of the standings, so my sets are a historical record of the year.

I'm glad you took it as the good natured poke it was meant to be. 

I used to like by number, but enjoy by team more past few years, even though I build the set from a box in number order.

Mark 

That is a cool idea