2011-12 Upper Deck Artifacts Hockey Forum

My seven are uploaded if you wish to look, there are not too many of these cards even imaged so hopefully you can see my point if view. I am dead tired folks that was a long evening .............. for 16 versions of one card!! Sheesh.

The dash (-) will make it look like an insert set to an insert set. In card set listings you'll notice the format is "Base Set - Insert Set"  The dash between is generated by the database to separate the insert set name from the base set name. Using your format with the additional dash (-) it'll look like there's an additional insert to the insert "Base Set - Insert Set - Insert Set".  And we all know, just because someone else did it that way doesn't mean it's correct (no offense to anyone meant).  It's just there's no answer in the Creating Set Entries guidelines, so Admin would have to answer it about dashes or other additional punctuation.

Yeah I see-sawed all night, re-entered with the dash and then after staring at that exact style of list said it still looked wrong so thats when I took the step back and reposted later about the corrections again. Still not sure if it it "right" but they match the cards as close as I can say is right so hopefully if it does get inspeceted it gets the green light.

Yeah, I guess I was remembering wrong anyway.  I went back and looked at the set I was thinking of, and it turns out I must have decided the dashes looked wrong because I actually used a colon as a separator:

http://www.tradingcarddb.com/Inserts.cfm/sid/6007/1997-Pinnacle-Mint-Collection

http://www.tradingcarddb.com/Inserts.cfm/sid/6094/1998-Pinnacle-Mint-Collection

-Tom

I see your point, but to use your colon ewwwwwwwwwww. =) Sometimes a colon would make the descriptive work better, as always its a set by set adventure.