2001 Fleer E-X Football Forum

Cards 91-108 in this set are listed as having both. This can't be, especially when the PR number listed is lower than the SN stamped on each card. I mean it can't be...right?

In the set notes it says the first xx cards of the run were autographed and the rest were not, hence the way they are listed 

This was a common thing in the late 90s/early 00s. Manufacturers would tier a single insert set. Diamond King, I think, were an example. They were link SNXXXX where the first XXX were canvas and the remaining xxx were standard card stock. The SN1 indictaes that the entire set was the SNXXXX, but that particulare version of the card had a certain PR within it. As pointed out, hopefully most sets like this have Release Notes attached.

1) Ideally the base set Note1 should be SN then PR to avoid confusion. Big number listed first, then how many of those cards weren't signed.

2) The autographed checklist under Inserts/Related doesn't have everyone, so what happened to the first 125 cards for players that didn't sign? Also why aren't all the autographed versions listed as SN____, PR125?