| Posted By | Message |
|
budler
Posts: 2,175
Joined: Dec 2017
|
| Wednesday, February 19, 2020 2:29 PM | |
Should the card numbers have the R in front of the number as it is now? On the card refractors is below the numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,962
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Wednesday, February 19, 2020 2:40 PM | |
What is with the R & V on these cards?
Edited on: Feb 19, 2020 - 2:41PM
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,478
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Wednesday, February 19, 2020 2:40 PM | |
There should be no "R". The numbers do not have a prefix. Same with the "V".
Edited on: Feb 19, 2020 - 2:41PM
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,478
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Wednesday, February 19, 2020 2:44 PM | |
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
cl_kyle
Posts: 839
Joined: Feb 2013
|
| Wednesday, February 19, 2020 3:12 PM | |
All card #s should be VARs for red/blue or rookie/veteran  In all seriousness, I'm not sure how these sets should be sorted, 1994 and 1995 in baseball are sorted similar to this with "blue" 1-90 first, then "red" 1-90, then Mirror Image (91-110 for 1994, 1-15 again for 1995) as part of the base set. This 1995 FB set has the Mirror Image as an Insert set. Whatever the correct way is to do it, they should all be treated consistently. I don't know if there are BkB or HK releases those years, but Bowman's Best didn't figure out a decent numbering system until 1996.
|
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,962
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:44 PM | |
There was a baseball Bowman's Best set that I worked with Admin on - the numbers should be as they are on the cards (which will mean 2 of each number), and we can call one version the [a] version and the other one the [b] version - as long as they remain consistent. If someone will please put in an IR (just ask to "egt ste formatted corrected" will be good enough), and I'll work on it tomorrow.
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
budler
Posts: 2,175
Joined: Dec 2017
|
| Wednesday, February 19, 2020 7:06 PM | |
I did an IR for the base set and the refractor set.
|
|
|
|
|
cl_kyle
Posts: 839
Joined: Feb 2013
|
| Wednesday, February 19, 2020 9:26 PM | |
I can submit the BB IRs (and look into other sports), but should the Mirror Image be part of the base set or an insert? I'll have to verify, but believe they were advertised as an insert for 1994 at least.
Personally, I would vote insert as there are a drastically different of the number of each in a typical box. I'm open to others opinions.
|
|
|
|
|
Corky
Posts: 863
Joined: May 2015
|
| Thursday, February 20, 2020 4:03 PM | |
I am working on the set right now
|
|
|
|
|
BigEd76
Posts: 4,006
Joined: Nov 2016
|
| Sunday, April 4, 2021 12:01 AM | |
Were updates to this set finished last year? Looks like the "a" and "b" are still in the primary card number and need to be split off
-------------------------------
* Ed * L8 * Cards in my personal Collection are unavailable * |
|
|
|
