Card Identification Forum

Thanks for clarifying, and the answer to that is no because it's a misprint printing error, not a variation

Oh, gotcha. That's understandable. 

I'll just go ahead and make a note that I have a misprint in the "detailed add" section. 

It's definitely not the 1994 Archives set .... those backs are white and say " * Topps Baseball Archives * The Ultimate 1954 Series* " at the bottom.

IMHO, you should be happy. The card front has the original look and not ruined by the foil.

Way to look on the bright side!

I'm happy just to be into the hobby. It's always neat to find some unique cards in your collection you didn't know about before. 

C2Cigars wrote:

IMHO, you should be happy. The card front has the original look and not ruined by the foil.

jdogg1228 wrote:

Oh, gotcha. That's understandable. 

I'll just go ahead and make a note that I have a misprint in the "detailed add" section. 

FreehanSolo wrote:

Thanks for clarifying, and the answer to that is no because it's a misprint printing error, not a variation

jdogg1228 wrote:

Sorry guys, should have worded that a bit differently. 

I understand what you were saying, I was just asking if there should be a VAR/ERR listed for those like me who have the error card with no Topps Archives logo. 

Doesn't appear the product had any box bottoms. I'm curious, does the card appear handcut? The one edge appears rough. 

Oh yeah, I do see that rough edge.

I see a tiny little sliver of white on that side and the other edges seem a bit rockier that normal. 

It's a possibility.