Card Identification Forum

Many of the backs talk about the completed 1997-98 season.  So were these issued post-season at the Big East tournament or NCAA tournament?
https://www.comc.com/Cards/Basketball/1997-98/University_of_Connecticut_Huskies_Team_Issue_-_Base,sc,ot

Here are two:

This post inspired me to look around COMC and I found a women's set which I was unable to spot here on TCDB.

If anyone is up for another adventure: https://www.comc.com/Cards,sc,=1997+University+of+Connecticut+Huskies+Women~27s+Team+Issue,ot

(Question for the group, is it bad forum etiquette to "tag on" a different topic to an already established forum post?)

I refer to it as "hijacking" a forum thread.

Got it. Thank you for the response, apologies for the hijack.

That's just my point of view. I think it best to start your own threads. You may have a topic of interest that you don't want to get lost in someone else's thread.

It is not just about courtesy either, there are practical implications.  Many topics from the Card Identification forum get moved to the forum for the particular set they are about, especially if the set gets added to the database because of the discussion.

If you add a post about another set to that thread, that information will be harder to find later because it will be associated with the wrong set.  Best practice for identification requests (and new discoveries) is to keep the sets in separate threads.  If you think there is some similarity and the discussions would benefit form participants being aware of both threads, you can post a link to one in the other.  Just make sure you're clear about why you think the discussions pertain to each other, a "Hey look at my topic too" post will be viewed as hijacking.

I hope many readers understand this reasoning, I don't mean to just 'pile on' to you RefsInTheBack.