| Posted By | Message |
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,974
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Tuesday, March 8, 2016 8:45 PM | |
Yes, I'm yelling it. To those who keep doing this, please stop. Admin has reiterated that there are NO RCs or XRCs in any parallel sets. At least one more was added this way today. I have since removed the RC in the Note field.
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
NJDevils
Posts: 6,344
Joined: Sep 2010
|
| Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:05 PM | |
Fine, but what about if a player's ONLY Topps card is a Gold parallel? Would that not be his rookie card? Have at it! LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,974
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:09 PM | |
Yeah, I think they did that in hockey, where they replaced checklists with players in the Gold parallel set.That's the very rare exception. Thanks for bringing that up. :)
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
ranfordfan
Posts: 4,975
Joined: Jun 2014
|
| Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:15 PM | |
NJD always stirring the pot eh .............. must be his water?! As for the yelling ........ please do not stop it !! =) I know that parallel and inserts do not count. Does that go for anything mem or autos? I know it has to be a major release and in the base set but some of those sets include both autos and mem cards. Clarification ........... and make it LOUD AND CLEAR!!
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
NJDevils
Posts: 6,344
Joined: Sep 2010
|
| Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:18 PM | |
Topps Baseball 1993 Gold #s 823-824-825 Yes, replaced checklist.
|
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,974
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:42 PM | |
Exception, not the rule.
NJDevils wrote: Topps Baseball 1993 Gold #s 823-824-825 Yes, replaced checklist.
|
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
ranfordfan
Posts: 4,975
Joined: Jun 2014
|
| Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:47 PM | |
OOOHHHH your talking baseball I see ............. yeah not me. =)
Edited on: Mar 8, 2016 - 9:47PM
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Lea DeFoote
Posts: 1,535
Joined: Jul 2012
|
| Tuesday, March 8, 2016 10:05 PM | |
If it is the only version of the card, then it is not a parallel.
NJDevils wrote: Fine, but what about if a player's ONLY Topps card is a Gold parallel? Would that not be his rookie card? Have at it! LOL.
|
-------------------------------
Ted Musgrave card collection 98.9% Complete: Cards Known: 1013, Cards Owned: 1002 I prefer the company of people who disagree with me for the right reasons over the company of those who agree with me for the wrong reasons. |
|
|
|
|
Mitch
Posts: 258
Joined: Feb 2016
|
| Wednesday, March 9, 2016 9:03 AM | |
What about the situation where there are two cards for a player as part of a major release?
Example: 96-97 ultra basketball.
Series 1 contains Kobe Bryant
Series 2 also contains a Kobe Bryant card listed as a rookie encore on the card which is a subset within the major release.
I would be inclined to say that the series 1 card is the "RC" and that the series 2 card would be more or less treated as an insert or parallel in that it is not a true rookie card. I know there will be differing opinions but I am just curious about your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
|
|
|
