Posted By | Message |
oithematt
Posts: 23
Joined: Aug 2019
|
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 7:28 AM | |
I was perusing eBay recently and came across a disturbing number of sellers that have self-made reprints of cards for sale, some for outrageous prices.
How is this legal?
I guess as long as they list it as a reprint (which to their defense they did), but isn't this copyright infringement at the very least since they are trying to profit off someone else's property?
-------------------------------
"Fear causes hesitation, and hesitation causes your worst fears to come true."
|
|
|
|
griffey423
Posts: 652
Joined: Jul 2014
|
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 7:30 AM | |
They're not reprints, they're forgeries. And no, it isn't legal.
-------------------------------
Always looking for baseball variation/error cards and anything Garrett Whitley or Ian Anderson
|
|
|
|
wjhipwell
Posts: 43
Joined: Jun 2016
|
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 9:56 AM | |
100% agree...a legitimate reprint still needs to be licensed. What eBay has been inundated with are indeed forgeries...including images and logos that have been, quite frankly, stolen. I recently spent some time updating all my eBay saved search alerts to include "-reprint" and "-custom" to eliminate these from my feed.
|
|
|
|
nyygregory
Posts: 223
Joined: Oct 2016
|
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 10:38 AM | |
I report tons of these on ebay but nothing ever happens, I guess they don't care as long as it's not listed as an original.
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Godzilla8you
Posts: 349
Joined: Jan 2019
|
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:40 PM | |
This is so sad, as a collector of vintage and new, this gives me doubt that the cards that don't indicate reprint really are original. I do buy vintage cards off of COMC and Deans. Since they actually house the cards I'm hoping they do their do diligence.
-------------------------------
Collecting Red Sox-----All Years.
|
|
|
|
bevans
Posts: 437
Joined: Oct 2016
|
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:54 PM | |
I bought a LeBron James rookie card from COMC and didn't notice that it was probably a fake until about six months later. They offered a full refund including return shipping if I sent it back to them, despite the lengthy delay between me purchasing it and reporting the problem. (In fact, I hadn't even requested a refund when I contacted them. I was just urging them to take a closer look at other cards received from the same seller.)
The bad news for me: It was a $25 card when I bought it but six months later (just after the Cavs 2016 championship) it was a $50 card when I got my refund and went shopping for a replacement.
|
|
|
|
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
|
|
|
bevans
Posts: 437
Joined: Oct 2016
|
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 4:30 PM | |
It was the Fleer Tradition set, and I have one now.
|
|
|
|
reakins
Posts: 509
Joined: Jan 2015
|
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 5:22 PM | |
Unlicensed reprint = counterfeit
It is prohibited to sell replicas, counterfeits, knockoffs and unauthorized copies on eBay. According to eBay, selling such items can infringe on someone’s copyright or trademark, which is against the law and against eBay policy.
Selling counterfeit goods is illegal in the U.S or Canada, though there aren’t currently any laws for punishing consumers for buying counterfeits.
Unfortunately, the practice of selling "reprints" on EBay is rampant as there seems to be little to no repercussions for sellers who do so.
-------------------------------
~Rob~ Hockey set collector including inserts, ERR, COR, VAR. Knowledgeable about 1968-69 to 1994-95 hockey. All 1990 and newer cards for trade are NRMT. Expect the same in return. 1989 and older are assigned a grade. Everything on my trade list is available for sale. Reasonable prices based on condition. If it's not on my tradelist, it's not available.
|
|
|
|
spazmatastic
Posts: 5,905
Joined: Dec 2014
|
Wednesday, September 11, 2019 11:29 PM | |
If it's an EXACT copy of a licensed card and not made by the licensed company, it is a forgery and that's illegal. Topps reprints a ton of their own cards (to excess IMO), but they made the original and usually make it obvious that they re-printed it. That is legally okay.
I'm still not sure how ACEO is getting away with so much of that. They are reprinting cards they didn't make originally, but apparently slightly altering the card and telling everyone what they did gets them off the hook for copyright infringement. I still don't see how that is legal or how the manufacturers haven't gone after them yet. Heck, Beckett goes insane over anyone copying their checklists and marketing data. So much so that they intentionally put errors in their CL's to find out when their CL/info was copied by another company. Look how many publishers/websites they took out by doing that!
-------------------------------
NO PWE's EVER!!! PLZ PM me 1st before sending any offer. ONLY selling cards as of March 2024. No trades or purchases right now. _______________________________________________________________________ Largest total PC card collections by Team, then Athlete (as of 3/22/24): STL Cardinals (MLB) - 8810; Carolina Panthers - 2888; GB Packers - 1790+ cards Mark Martin (NASCAR) - 2038 cards; Jimmie Johnson (NASCAR) - 1875 cards; Jeff Gordon (NASCAR) - 1594; Ricky Rudd (NASCAR) - 839; Ozzie Smith (MLB) - 707
|
|
|
|