So, I finally tackled this large pile of what I think is the most over-produced set ever (or definitely in the top 5). And yes, I have over 50,000 of these cards. Why sort them? Those crazy hologram VAR!
End Game:
We now have 714 1990 Baseball, 444 1990 Hockey, 241 1990 Comic Ball, and 198 1992 Diamond UD logo VAR listed (#s to the best of my counting).
The 1991 "Upper Deck" hologram is the most common as it was supposed to be "The One" on all cards. Of the 50,000+ cards I have, all but about 2,000 are of this variation. The FS I have opened is ALL of this variation. Tilted in the right light, very bright but small "91"s will often shine in the lines of "UPPER DECK" print. Often these holograms are very faint or at times it looks like there is nothing imprinted on the siver foil. Very poor quality.
The 1990 baseball and the 1992 Diamond Logo VAR are the easiest to differentiate. The Baseball logo initially looks like a smudge till tilted under the right light to see the baseballs.
The other two VAR can be questioned which is it till you see both. The Hockey logo has a larger "90" in the hologram. The Comic Ball "90" is much smaller. As for the crossed hockey sticks or carrots, I will take other collectors' word on it. When you tilt the Comic Ball VAR in the light, it looks like the rows travel horizontally across the foil and also appear more "goldish".
I also found 2 cards that missed the foil stamping (yes I know these are not listable). It is not that the foil peeled off but I believe the sheet just did not get put through that process. I have another where the home plate hologram is peeled off but a clear imprint has been left where it was. I also saw a few that had the hologram in the wrong spot but also had the bits of a second hologram, usually two sides of the home plate, in other areas. I put this off to the junk era rush to get product out so poor quality control on the company's part.
Personal Conclusions:
Yes, the most over-produced set or one of. No, I did not go out buying these up in the early 1990s but instead accumulated such a hoard from buying collections (not just for 1991 UD baseball) including from one of our members in Ottawa who had already extracted and put in a separate box the hologram VAR from the 17,000 cards he sold me. I now have 25 sets collated and 2 FS (one unopened). Anyone want to buy one or two? If necessary, I can probably put together another 10-20 if the demand is great.
My binder set is all of the 1991 UD hologram VAR (now). The only other set I will slowly try to put together is the Baseball hologram one as I already have over half the cards we have listed. (Is this where I ask what people think a set of just this hologram would be worth?) Yes, I believe if everyone searched their stock including the hand-collated set, we would discover that all of these can be found with the Baseball hologram. I will not list my missing ones as wants as not everyone checks the VAR when trading and last I need is to add to my boxes of these.
Surprisingly, once under the right light, you can go through many of these in not much time. The sorting in numerical order of the 17,000 cards from Ottawa took longer than going through the 30,000 cards I already had.
All other VAR I have are for trade and listed correctly. I have had a couple of members ask about individual ones wishing to buy them. Problem is, for one card (or 2) you are looking at a cost that really does not make sense. After Paypal's changes in policy, I won't use them anymore to sell. For me to ship a card will cost $1.60 and you have to find a way to get me the money. Then there is the cost of the card.
Result:
I have several hours of my life I will not get back. In the words of one of our friends, "I need a new hobby!"
If you have read this far, you too have lifetime that you will now never get back.
Bruno
--------
Check my Profile page to see my 2023 Goals and my Lists of sets near completion (5 cards or less) or sets getting close (less than 100 cards missing and 75% complete).
https://www.tcdb.com/Forum.cfm/Page/B/ID/0/?MODE=VIEW&ThreadID=25745&C=0