1991 Topps Baseball Forum

Well that took a turn I didn't expect.

Just want to point out that the Dark Logos could be listed as VARs in the base set, considering the recent change in how these types of printing changes (such as hologram variances) are now documented here (per Admin's advice/suggestion/request - whatever you want to call it - directive?).

I will contact Admin regarding these. We have been in contact about other sets and getting them combined as that is how they should be - they weren't released as a special "Look for the Dark Logo cards randomly inserted in packs and/or sets". This wasn't a special "parallel" - it was a variance in the printing and albeit an intentional thing done (much like changing the photo used on Wes Chamberlain), it doesn't make the first picture used a "parallel" of the base set.

.....and it continues, thx Jason but the 4 paragraph reply is meaningless and needless.

I don't care whether you get the right backs scanned anymore or not. Those that want to know will get the correct facts. Gray Backs, White Backs, I have both, if you fail to recognize my collection, Oh well, but they do exist. ditto!

You and your cronies only niche here is to directly antagonize me, decline my IRs, discredit my collection and falsely reply to my posts. But that's OK, I already told you, YOU WON....hands up, white flag....I will follow my plan.

Back to work

Dan,

If this does happen could you please send out one of those mass emails, for those of us with this in our collection ?

As a team collector, I put variations ( regardless of form) next to the base card. My parallels are in a separate binder. 

THANK YOU sir :)

Joe,

Normally, I wouldn't think of doing that, but since you asked, I'l be sure to have Admin do it (since it would be to 100s of members). I can handle sending out about 50-80 max. Thanks for the reminder.

Dan