2000 Multi-Ad Midwest League Top Prospects (Numbered) Baseball Forum

Currently the cards in this set are all listed as NNO.  However, the cards are numbered.  You have to look at the bottom of the card where the typical copyright line would be.  There is a MultiAD Sports Logo with a small number below it.  These are the cards numbers.  But....   There is one issue I cannot explain with certainty.  Albert Pujols is card #20 in this set.   I dont know why there are versions of this same card with no number, nor why both numbered and no numbered versions of this card that were graded by beckett are labled as #21.  I think Beckett made and error, because I did see atlease one Beckette graded one labled correctly with the #20.  The first assumpton is that Albert Pujols cards not origional to the sets are the un numbered card, and were reprints.   Anyone have any information on this?

My appologies for the mispelling of the word Prospects in the title, I couldnt find a way to edit the title.

I noticed Beckett has the set numbers messed up on their site.  

Is it possible there is two sets?  I only ask because 3 cards among those scans don't really have the same back as the rest (the three have more of a red back instead of the burnt orange back the others have).  Those three have no numbers on them and include the Pujols.  Though it could also confirm your theory they are reprints because the other two cards are the checklist and the Josh Beckett, which I would think be the only other one with a possibilty of having a reprint (fake) market, aside from the Lyle Overbay.

I guess my question would be, is there two sets, OR does Pujols, Beckett, and the checklist have cards WITH numbers on them?  If so, I say we find those scans, add them and change the NNO to the correct numbers.  If need be and proven those cards without numbers aren't reprints then either add them as variations or if all the cards had them as a parallel.

I purchased this set and it arrived in the mail last week.  The entire set is NNO.  So apparently there are complete sets of the numbered variety and complete sets of the un-numbered variety.