Site Forum

Can we add  0.0   and  0.5   to the rating scale.  I feel that  1995 Fleer baseball  and 1995 Fleer Update baseball deserve 0.0, but I am forced to give them a 1.0

Amen!  Hideous set. Especially the LSD-induced cards.

As much as I hate 1991 Fleer, I don't think adding a 0 would be a good idea.  I think all cards despite how bad they are deserve some type of rating.  I do agree though that a 0.5 would be good to add.

  Scale of 1-10 is fine.    This isn't basketball or hockey where they  need have  .3 seconds on the clock.

We could try it out.

If we're going to have 0.5, then we should also have 0.0; otherwise, it should be left at 1.0

I'm OK with the scale of 1 to 10.  Adding a zero would mean I would have to go back and re-vote on a few sets, and I really don't want to punish my eyes like that.  It's bad enough I found a stack of 1995 Fleer the other day and had to add them to my collection!

I just looked at the bottom of the Top Sets list, and was surprised that only one set in baseball has a rating beneath 2.0

Currently, of 1037 sets with ratings, 1995 Fleer ranks 1026 and 1995 Fleer Update ranks 1032.  They are down there with Donruss puzzle pieces.

OK, after that post, I spent the last hour voting on sets.  I happened upon a Broder set with one vote, which was a 10.  My mind is blown.