Random Card of the Day



Monday, July 26, 2021

Year: 2006

Set: Upper Deck (Rate)

Card: #1194 Ben Zobrist


“ Nice simple set, big contrast between UD and Topps. The back of the rookie cards in the set, like this one, with no stats, feels empty. ” -abide
  2
“ Compared to some of his later cards on the cubs, he looks so young right here! Also, I'm very surprised about this card number! #1194! Unbelievable how many cards were in this set. ” -jdogg1228
  1
“ i dont like on the back when it just says no MLB experience... Like i cant tell from all the seasons with the Chattanooga's, Yakima's and Chattahoochee's that this person hasnt made it to the bigs yet. But thanks UD for not letting me see any MiLB stats. ” -parsley24
  2
“ I like this Upper Deck set. It isn't great and it isn't a "favorite" set but it is OK. Back is OK even with reusing the same picture as the front as a headshot. ” -captkirk42

“ Not too bad, but UD didn't always have same photo on front and back and I am not sure what is going on with the tiny foil font over the last name. ” -muskie027


Additional Comments

Posted ByMessage

Onemorepoint

Posts: 1446
Joined: Apr 2014
Monday, July 26, 2021 3:50 AM

Am I the only one who thinks the photo looks a bit odd due to the positioning of his arms?


   

Y4123

Posts: 14
Joined: Jul 2017
Monday, July 26, 2021 11:37 AM

At first glance I thought this was an Oakland As card, why do green Rays jerseys exist??


-------------------------------

Related to Hobie Landrith, the Mets 1st pick in the 1961 expansion draft.


   

mwccards

Posts: 185
Joined: May 2018
Monday, July 26, 2021 3:23 PM

...Because those were the TAMPA BAY DEVIL RAYS, baby! The back of this card made me chuckle because I remember being ticked that they traded Julio Lugo and his (.308 BA, 12 HR, 18 SB) to the Dodgers. BTW, Lugo hit .209 with 0 HR for the Dodgers the rest of the way. Andrew Friedman was just getting started.

Y4123 wrote:

At first glance I thought this was an Oakland As card, why do green Rays jerseys exist??


   

omadison27

Posts: 23
Joined: Dec 2016
Monday, July 26, 2021 7:14 PM

The answer is:  2006 upper deck.

"What series makes me happy I'm not a set collector."

Alex:  "Right, pick again".


   

tschlack

Posts: 14
Joined: Apr 2019
Monday, July 26, 2021 8:02 PM

2006 UD was an undaunting set to build.  For me, still putting together the series three or update portion. 


   

BigEd76

Posts: 3998
Joined: Nov 2016
Tuesday, July 27, 2021 12:08 AM

Nice simple design but I hated this set. It doesn't fit into a standard 3-ring binder, even with cards back-to-back.


Edited on: Jul 27, 2021 - 12:09AM
-------------------------------

* Ed * L8 * Cards in my personal Collection are unavailable *


   


Log in or register to continue.



  

Copyright © 2024 Trading Card Database LLC
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.