Random Card of the Day

“ Very plain, and I don't remember this player at all. ” -switzr1

“ This design was used for the rookies in the NBA set. I liked the base card design better. ” -Billy Kingsley

“ Ironic that a True Colors card is grey & white for the majority . ” -uncaian

“ Minimum interest. I don't get the series name nor the subset name and to make matters worse for my taste it has a Paninian-influenced photo on the back. ” -Sportzcommish

“ The fall of one of the 80's and 90's card giants. Also, when have the Giants ever had beige as a true color. ” -IfbBirdsCards

“ Boring! ” -carthage44

“ No wonder this design was never rehashed as part of any "retro/heritage/archives/legacy" set. Aside from the ballpark image (not team-related - same one on every card), there is nothing redeeming about it. If I'm pressed to say something positive, at least the font is large enough to be legible. There. I tried. ” -dilemma19

“ An OK card. Nice and simple but almost too complicated. Even though I like it there is something that doesn't see right. Not sure why. Maybe too dull looking? Back is OK ” -captkirk42

“ Same drab designs they've always had. ” -RoundtheDiamond87

“ Well I was not collecting Baseball back in 2002 so I had to research this set a bit, I found it was a very unpopular set? I don't think it looks all that bad, in fact, I kind of like it, however, the Rookies lack, and this is even with a 500 print run. Maybe because this was a slow rookie crop that never really got over? Who knows why a set will get released and fall from grace not 12 days after release? If I had to rate this set I would give it a solid 6/10 I like it, not love it, but I do like it. I will now look to buy one....Take care all ” -The House Of Cards

“ Future Kansas City Royals pitcher. ” -trauty